kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dynamics of related and unrelated digital diversification in established firms: Strategies, programs, process, and outcomes
Department of Managementand Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Managementand Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 752 37, Uppsala, Sweden.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Engineering Design, Integrated Product Development and Design.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2444-6168
CDIO Piab AB, Vendevägen 89, 182 32 Danderyd, Vendevägen 89.
2024 (English)In: Technological forecasting & social change, ISSN 0040-1625, E-ISSN 1873-5509, Vol. 202, article id 123300Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research on digital transformation focuses on business models and technological innovation but it often lacks a detailed exploration of how firms develop, execute, and evaluate related and unrelated digital diversification strategies. To address this gap, this study employs a multiple case study approach to uncover the varied processes and outcomes of implementing digital diversification programs in established firms. The findings reveal that established firms frequently refine and adjust their digital diversification strategies to achieve desired results. Specifically, related digital diversification strategies benefit from well-defined market segments, clear technological focus, and robust senior management support. In contrast, unrelated digital diversification strategies thrive through extensive exploration and experimentation with novel digital technologies and markets, reduced senior managerial intervention and increased middle- and lower-level management involvement. Semi-related digital diversification strategies, which incorporate elements of both related and unrelated approaches, often encounter tensions owing to conflicting traditional and new program execution methods, posing significant realization challenges. Key factors identified as instrumental in the success of digital diversification strategies include technology, markets, management & organization, and program execution. The study concludes by discussing the managerial and academic implications and offers recommendations for future research in this domain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 202, article id 123300
Keywords [en]
Digital diversification, Digitalization programs, Established manufacturing firms, Management involvement, Related vs unrelated, Strategy implementation
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-344174DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123300ISI: 001192335500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185836826OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-344174DiVA, id: diva2:1842894
Note

QC 20240307

Available from: 2024-03-06 Created: 2024-03-06 Last updated: 2025-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Simonsson, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Simonsson, Johan
By organisation
Integrated Product Development and Design
In the same journal
Technological forecasting & social change
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 161 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf