kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beyond boundaries: AI-optimized global landslide susceptibility mapping
Department of Computer Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Geophysical Exploration, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Water and Environmental Engineering. Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7978-0040
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, ISSN 1947-5705, E-ISSN 1947-5713, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 2493222Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Landslides pose a significant global threat, causing extensive loss of life, economic damage and environmental degradation. Despite advancements in landslide susceptibility mapping, existing methods often lack global-scale applicability and fail to incorporate robust optimization strategies for improved predictive accuracy. This study addresses these gaps by developing an optimized framework using support vector regression (SVR) enhanced with meta-heuristic algorithms (grey wolf optimizer [GWO] and bat algorithm) to refine model hyper-parameters. It integrates a globally representative data set of 37,984 landslide and non-landslide locations, ensuring broader applicability and generalizability. The information gain ratio method assessed the relative importance of 12 geo-environmental factors influencing landslide. The results indicated that all models achieved good predictive performance during the testing phase, as evidenced by an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value exceeding 0.8, but the SVR-GWO model exhibited the highest prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.92), making it suitable for large-scale hazard assessment. Plan curvature emerged as the most influential factor, surpassing slope, land use, and rainfall that are dominant at regional or local scales. The five countries with the highest landslide-prone areas were Russia, Canada, USA, China, and Brazil. The results support policymakers and urban planners in developing efficient strategies to minimize landslide risks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2025. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 2493222
Keywords [en]
bat algorithm, global scale, grey wolf optimizer, Landslide susceptibility map, support vector regression
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-363401DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2025.2493222ISI: 001481663000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105004425915OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-363401DiVA, id: diva2:1958496
Note

QC 20250519

Available from: 2025-05-15 Created: 2025-05-15 Last updated: 2025-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kalantari, Zahra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kalantari, Zahra
By organisation
Water and Environmental Engineering
In the same journal
Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf