kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing peer-reviewed competence frameworks for engineers: A systematic review and critical discussion of backgrounds, development, and content
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Language and communication. (Global Competence)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8052-889X
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Language and communication. (Global Competence)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6223-3385
2025 (English)In: Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, ISSN 1324-5821, E-ISSN 1325-4340Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The field of engineering evolves rapidly and universities face the challenge of preparing graduates with the competencies needed for the profession. To guide these efforts, clear, broadly applicable, and practical competence frameworks are needed. While numerous frameworks exist, no widely accepted model has emerged. Given the varying quality of these frameworks, which can overwhelm universities that aim to address this issue, this study provides an in-depth examination of non-technical competence frameworks for engineers. A systematic literature review of the most frequently cited peer-reviewed competence frameworks was conducted, and a total of 40 publications were thematically analysed. Four broad types of competence frameworks emerged – global, professional, generic, and sustainability competence. While there were differences between them, similarities also became apparent, such as an emphasis on social intelligence and information literacy. However, many frameworks also shared problems that could hinder their impact, such as a lack of contextual adaptability or practical indicators. Based on these findings, the study proposes core attributes for an ideal framework to guide educational efforts to integrate non-technical competencies into engineering education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2025.
Keywords [en]
Competence frameworks, engineering education, competence-based education, systematic review
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Technology and Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-363505DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2025.2509390Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105007024240OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-363505DiVA, id: diva2:1958936
Note

QC 20250521

Available from: 2025-05-17 Created: 2025-05-17 Last updated: 2025-06-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Global competence education in practice: Exploring opportunities for integrative competence development at higher engineering institutions
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Global competence education in practice: Exploring opportunities for integrative competence development at higher engineering institutions
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The 21st century has placed new professional demands on engineers as a result of global economic, social, environmental, and technological developments. As a result, engineering institutions have been under pressure to evolve their curricula to better prepare students for their future professions. Industry and academic scholarship have long recognized that engineering education must foster global competence in students, but the complexity of the concept may make its integration challenging. Despite its proliferation in educational literature, the concept is still in its infancy, which is connected to a lack of practical experience and empirical data for informed decisions. Considering that global competence learning may be a foreign concept to traditional technical and science education, there is a risk that well-intentioned but overeager efforts may not lead to the desired learning outcomes. These considerations guided the research project presented here, which examines global competence education for engineering students with the aim of developing an empirical foundation for advancing practical institutional engagement with the issue. Recognizing the need for a solid conceptual foundation at the basis of any efforts, it revolves around three main themes of global competence education for engineers: conceptions of core global competencies for engineers, their development, and their assessment.

These themes are addressed by synthesizing the insights of five studies that combine a large-scale review of engineering institutions’ practical efforts, a comparison of competence frameworks, stakeholder evaluations of competence importance, and the experiences and perspectives of engineering students and educators. Synthesizing the insights of these studies, this thesis first addresses the concept of global competence and its contents by providing a detailed conceptualization of global competence including a definition and core competencies, and examines what it means to be globally competent. Moreover, it addresses the issue of global competence learning at engineering institutions by providing a proposal for an institutional strategy for global competence efforts, which was developed by combining insights into institutional global competence efforts with stakeholder experiences and perspectives. In this regard, this thesis complements its empirical investigation with more practical contributions, and may serve as a valuable foundation for further theoretical and practical engagement with global competence education.

Abstract [sv]

Globala ekonomiska, sociala, miljömässiga och tekniska förändringar under 2000-talet har lett till nya krav på ingenjörer. För att möta dessa och förbereda studenter för framtida yrkesverksamhet måste lärosäten anpassa innehållet i sina utbildningar. Såväl industri som forskning har i denna kontext länge betonat vikten av utbildning i global kompetens, men implementering av sådan undervisning har visat sig vara svårt, delvis på grund av begreppets komplexa natur. Trots en ökad förekomst inom utbildningsvetenskaplig litteratur befinner sig begreppet fortfarande i ett relativt tidigt skede, kopplat till en brist på praktisk erfarenhet och empiriska data som grund för väl underbyggda beslut. Eftersom global kompetens dessutom fortfarande kan uppfattas som främmande för traditionell teknisk och naturvetenskaplig utbildning finns också en risk att välmenande försök inte leder till önskade lärandemål. Detta är bakgrunden till det forskningsprojekt som presenteras här och som undersöker utbildning i global kompetens för ingenjörsstudenter med syfte att bidra till att utveckla en empirisk bas för att främja praktiskt institutionellt engagemang i frågan. Med beaktande av behovet av en stark konceptuell grund fokuserar projektet på tre kärnteman inom global kompetensutbildning för ingenjörer: kärnkompetenser för ingenjörer, samt utveckling och bedömning av dessa.

Fem delstudier tar sig an temana från olika håll: en granskning av praktiska insatser inom ingenjörsutbildningar, en jämförelse av olika kompetensramverk, utvärderingar från intressenter om värdet av olika kompetenser, samt erfarenheter och perspektiv från ingenjörsstudenter och lärare. Genom att förena insikter från dessa studier närmar sig avhandlingen begreppet global kompetens och dess innehåll genom en fördjupad analys av begreppets innehåll, inklusive en definition och identifiering av centrala kompetenser, samt en undersökning av vad det innebär att vara globalt kompetent. Vidare behandlas frågan om hur global kompetens kan utvecklas inom ramen för ingenjörsutbildningar och ett förslag till en institutionell strategi för sådant utvecklingsarbete presenteras, baserat på empiriska insikter om lärosätens kompetensinitiativ och olika intressenters erfarenheter och uppfattningar. Genom att avhandlingens empiriska analys på så sätt kompletteras med mer tillämpade bidrag kan den utgöra en potentiellt betydelsefull grund för fortsatt teoretisk och praktisk utveckling av utbildning för global kompetens.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, 2025. p. 215
Series
TRITA-ITM-AVL ; 2025:24
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Technology and Learning
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-363503 (URN)978-91-8106-305-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-06-12, https://kth-se.zoom.us/j/68340566296, D2, Lindstedtsvägen 9, Stockholm, 14:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-05-21 Created: 2025-05-20 Last updated: 2025-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Richter, TanjaKjellgren, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Richter, TanjaKjellgren, Björn
By organisation
Language and communication
In the same journal
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf