kth.sePublications KTH
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Projecting for sustainability transitions: Contrasting two types of project-oriented agency
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Management & Technology. Linnaeus Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management, Landgangen 6, S-39231 Kalmar, Sweden; KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Teknikringen 33, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4021-812X
CBS Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Org, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BI Norwegian Business Sch, Dept Leadership & Org Behav, Stavanger, Norway; Linköping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Linköping, Sweden.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0372-6785
2025 (English)In: International Journal of Project Management, ISSN 0263-7863, E-ISSN 1873-4634, Vol. 43, no 5, article id 102721Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A core problem in sustainability transitions is to ensure that actors come together and work on a common goal. Earlier research has argued that developing a project-oriented agency is essential to ensure transitions. By examining two contrasting cases, the Sustainable Transportation program and the Sustainable Hospital program, we identify two distinct types of project-oriented agency: (1) emergent and (2) induced. The former showcases an inclusive approach emphasizing open collaboration and resource mobilization, flexible goals, whereas the latter encompasses prescribed resource mobilization, contractual objectives, and deadlines. Beyond bottom-up vs. topdown dichotomies, these project-oriented agency types highlight different shaping contexts and logics of how actors mobilize projects for change. Our analysis identifies the nuanced dimensions of project-oriented agency and the impetuses, practices, and temporal structures through which they shape transition outcomes. The paper enriches the current understanding of how targeted projects and programs can bridge experimental niches with mainstream regime transformation, thereby enabling system-wide sustainability transitions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2025. Vol. 43, no 5, article id 102721
Keywords [en]
Project-oriented agency, Sustainability transitions, Project and program dynamics, Emergent and induced agency, Resource and knowledge mobilization, Temporal structuring, Comparative case study
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-372717DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102721ISI: 001527269900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009600474OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-372717DiVA, id: diva2:2017190
Note

QC 20251127

Available from: 2025-11-27 Created: 2025-11-27 Last updated: 2025-11-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hetemi, ErmalJerbrant, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hetemi, ErmalJerbrant, Anna
By organisation
Management & TechnologyIndustrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
In the same journal
International Journal of Project Management
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf