kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Discursive Discrimination Ableism and Linguicism in Governmental Documentation – The Case of Swedish Sign Language
Doctoral Student, Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Design Studies/Certec/EAT, Lund University/LTH, Lund, Sweden.
Associate Professor, Department of Special Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID. Doctoral Student, Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Design Studies/Certec/EAT, Lund University/LTH, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7975-6198
2025 (English)In: International Journal of Disability and Social Justice, ISSN 2732-4036, Vol. 5, no 3, p. 310-331Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Swedish Sign Language [svenskt teckenspråk, STS] has often been described as being the first officially recognised sign language in the world, passed into law in 1981. This was a parliamentary decision that later led to the provision of bimodal-bilingual education and the keeping of a separate school system for deaf students. However, today, STS is not granted the same rights as the five declared minority languages and not all deaf children in Sweden are being granted access to an education in STS. So, what exactly was decided by the Swedish Parliament in 1981? This critical discourse analysis shows that Swedish legislative documentation regarding STS, rests on unclear intertextual referencing, common-sense implied agreements, and discursive discrimination through linguicism and ableism, specifically audism. The legislative discourses studied reveal an accommodating ambition by the political actors, which is simultaneously ambiguous, non-binding, and leaves open many possible interpretations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Pluto Journals , 2025. Vol. 5, no 3, p. 310-331
Keywords [en]
critical discourse analysis, deaf, discursive discrimination, language policy, language rights, minority language, STS, Swedish Sign Language
National Category
Comparative Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-375710DOI: 10.13169/intljofdissocjus.5.3.0003ISI: 001655596500003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105026694591OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-375710DiVA, id: diva2:2029705
Note

QC 20260119

Available from: 2026-01-19 Created: 2026-01-19 Last updated: 2026-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Johansson, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Stefan
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID
Comparative Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf