kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Green or brown: are article 8 & 9 fund portfolios different?
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.). KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Management INDEK, Stockholm, Sweden; IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4199-2400
IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Finance, ISSN 1351-847X, E-ISSN 1466-4364, Vol. 31, no 15, p. 1948-1982Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper examines the extent to which the portfolios of green and conventional funds differ. We use non-metric multidimensional scaling to analyze the securities held by 6888 funds traded on European markets as of March 2023. This numerical methodology reduces the fund compositional matrix from thousands of dimensions to two dimensions, revealing patterns that can be studied graphically. We use the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation's Articles 8 and 9 to classify green funds, and with few exceptions find that green fund portfolios are largely the same as conventional fund portfolios. A notable exception are energy sector funds, where there are distinct differences between the holdings of green and conventional funds. Our findings suggest that the EU's regulatory effort on sustainable finance has not yet delivered on anti-greenwashing objectives, and that green investing is doing little to shift investment allocations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2025. Vol. 31, no 15, p. 1948-1982
Keywords [en]
Asset management, sustainable finance, investment funds, ESG, non-metric multidimensional scaling, ordination, G11, M14, D53
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-375618DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2025.2585960ISI: 001616971900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105022306231OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-375618DiVA, id: diva2:2030848
Note

QC 20260121

Available from: 2026-01-21 Created: 2026-01-21 Last updated: 2026-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sanctuary, Mark

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sanctuary, Mark
By organisation
Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
In the same journal
European Journal of Finance
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 313 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf