kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
University Boards and Institutional Governance After New Public Management Reforms: A Comparison Across Four European Countries
Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
CIES, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Science and Higher Education Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Higher Education Policy, ISSN 0952-8733, E-ISSN 1740-3863Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The aim of this article is to advance research on the impact of New Public Management reforms on higher education governance and the evolving role of university boards. More specifically, the study offers a novel international comparative assessment on how public higher education institutions’ board members perceive institutional decision-making processes and boards’ accountability and representation. We use data from a survey administered to individual board members in public HEIs across four European countries. Our results suggest that under New Public Management reforms boards have indeed gained influence in institutional decision-making processes and both internal and external stakeholders view institutions as more responsive to society’s needs. Yet, the representation of specific business and economic interests is much less pronounced while important differences remain across countries and different stakeholders. The article offers novel comparative insights into the hybridisation, divergence, and partial enactment of NPM principles, demonstrating how reform trajectories remain shaped by path-dependent dynamics within national systems and institutions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2026.
Keywords [en]
Higher education, Institutional governance, New public management, University boards
National Category
Business Administration Public Administration Studies Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-375926DOI: 10.1057/s41307-025-00435-xISI: 001655764000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105027164704OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-375926DiVA, id: diva2:2032418
Note

QC 20260127

Available from: 2026-01-27 Created: 2026-01-27 Last updated: 2026-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Geschwind, LarsLundborg, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Geschwind, LarsLundborg, Stefan
By organisation
Learning in Stem
In the same journal
Higher Education Policy
Business AdministrationPublic Administration StudiesPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf