kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring within-and-between differences in cycling travel time: A comparative study of İstanbul, Braga, and Tallinn
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Transport and Systems Analysis.ORCID iD: 0009-0001-3334-5684
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Transport and Systems Analysis.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6177-1795
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Transport and Systems Analysis.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5290-6101
2026 (English)In: Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, E-ISSN 2950-1059, Vol. 7, article id 100099Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Responding to climate change and sustainability goals, many cities and countries have renewed efforts to upgrade active transportation infrastructure, such as cycling. Supportive built environment conditions, such as dedicated cycling lanes, safe intersections, and low-traffic streetsare a necessary prerequisite to promote cycling and so is the understanding of behavioral variations in travel, with travel time being particularly crucial. Although travel time and value of travel time has been widely studied in transportation research cycling travel time is less explored, particularly how they vary across cities. Moreover, external factors such as wind speed and bike type (e.g., e-bike vs. conventional bike) can significantly influence cycling travel time. This study addresses these gaps by examining the effects of trip characteristics and socio-demographic factors on cycling travel time across three European cities: Tallinn, Braga, and Istanbulwhich differ in cultural and urban contexts but have each recently initiated policies to foster cycling. Using a Latent Class Accelerated Failure Time (LCAFT) model, the analysis reveals that, as expected, distance consistently increases travel time and e-bikes have low to significant effects. However, the influence of trip purpose and bike type varies depending on socio-demographic and cultural contexts. For instance, in Tallinn and Braga, age and gender significantly shape travel time, whereas in Istanbul, age and educational attainment are more influential. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating contextual and demographic differences when assessing cycling behavior across diverse urban settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 7, article id 100099
Keywords [en]
Active mobility, Comparative analysis, Cycling travel time, GPS data, Latent class accelerated failure time, Survey data
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-375983DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100099ISI: 001674983200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105027769036OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-375983DiVA, id: diva2:2035635
Note

Not duplicate with DiVA 1951079

QC 20260205

Available from: 2026-02-05 Created: 2026-02-05 Last updated: 2026-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jaafer, AmaniSharmeen, FariyaKarlström, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jaafer, AmaniSharmeen, FariyaKarlström, Anders
By organisation
Transport and Systems Analysis
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf