kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A quantitative analysis of studies on the information and communication technology sector's current and future direct climate impact
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Sustainability Assessment and Management. KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, KTH Climate Action Centre, CAC. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Centres, Digital futures.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9873-0949
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Sustainability Assessment and Management. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Centres, Digital futures. KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, KTH Climate Action Centre, CAC.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5600-0726
2026 (English)In: Environmental impact assessment review, ISSN 0195-9255, E-ISSN 1873-6432, Vol. 120, article id 108445Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent reviews of studies on the global information and communication technology (ICT) sector's current and future direct climate impact have provided general overviews and identified contradictory results regarding future impacts. So far, however, calculation approaches and strategies for future scenario construction behind these results have not been scrutinized in more detail and reasons behind contradictory results remain unclear. The aims of this study are (i) to identify reasons behind contradictory future projection results in previous studies of the global ICT sector's direct climate impact, (ii) compare these results with a recently published estimate for 2020 and (iii) to identify critical aspects and related practical challenges in these assessments. This was done via detailed reconstruction of future projection results combined with quantitative analysis of these results, focusing on model and parameter uncertainties. The results show that several of the reviewed studies apply strategies for future scenario construction that in practice do not allow decreasing emissions. Other reasons behind contradictory results are mainly due to model uncertainties, e.g. due to different scopes, but parameter uncertainties, related to e.g. number of end-user devices, are also significant. The comparison of future projections for 2020 with an estimate for the same year shows that projections tend to be significantly higher, e.g. 120-620% higher for global data center use phase emissions. The results from this study highlight the need for practical guidelines on how to conduct such studies, especially for identified critical aspects, such as limited inclusion of fast-growing and emerging digital technologies in previous studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 120, article id 108445
Keywords [en]
Direct impacts, Future studies, Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Information and communication technology (ICT), Life cycle assessment (LCA), Model uncertainty, Parameter uncertainty
National Category
Climate Science Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-379286DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108445ISI: 001730628400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105033852295OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-379286DiVA, id: diva2:2053660
Note

QC 20260417

Available from: 2026-04-17 Created: 2026-04-17 Last updated: 2026-04-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Furberg, AnnaFinnveden, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Furberg, AnnaFinnveden, Göran
By organisation
Sustainability Assessment and ManagementKTH Climate Action Centre, CACDigital futures
In the same journal
Environmental impact assessment review
Climate ScienceConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf