kth.sePublications KTH
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparative Assessment of Power Converter Control Strategies: From Linear Control to Machine Learning Approaches
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Electric Power and Energy Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9406-5600
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Electric Power and Energy Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2793-9048
University of Talca, Chile, 3340000; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hitachi Energy Research Center, Västerås, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, ISSN 1932-4529, E-ISSN 1941-0115, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 30-41Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article fills a gap by presenting the first experimental benchmarking study that compares the state-of-the-art model-free reinforcement learning (MFRL) controller with a widely adopted proportional integral (PI) controller with space vector modulation (SVM), finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC), and a supervised imitation artificial neural network (ANN) controller. The methods are implemented on a benchmark two-level voltage source converter (VSC) platform representative of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) applications. The evaluation covers steady-state performance, dynamic response, computational burden, robustness, and practical implementation considerations. By providing a holistic qualitative and quantitative comparison, the article delivers insights into the practical benefits and limitations of state-of-the-art converter control strategies. The results also provide the power electronics community with a clear reference and guidance for adopting RL-based controllers compared to well-established model-based or classical linear controllers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2026. Vol. 20, no 2, p. 30-41
National Category
Control Engineering Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-380046DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2026.3670999ISI: 001732753700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105034789123OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-380046DiVA, id: diva2:2055400
Note

QC 20260424

Available from: 2026-04-24 Created: 2026-04-24 Last updated: 2026-06-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wan, YihaoXu, Qianwen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wan, YihaoXu, Qianwen
By organisation
Electric Power and Energy Systems
In the same journal
IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine
Control EngineeringOther Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf