Adopting circular strategies in different vertical farms yields comparable environmental impact reductionsShow others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Resources Environment and Sustainability, E-ISSN 2666-9161, Vol. 25, article id 100335Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Vertical farms are an emerging industry that can enhance urban food self-sufficiency but must align with environmental goals. This study assesses whether circular economy strategies improve the environmental performance of two European VFs—VF1 in Spain and VF2 in Sweden—with differing technological maturity and geographical contexts. Life cycle assessment shows that energy use is the main contributor to environmental impacts, accounting for up to 88% in both cases. Circular strategies such as closed-loop irrigation, waste heat reuse, and material recycling reduce impacts by 7–77%. To compare their maturity level, scenario analyses (Current, Linear, Improvement) reveal that VF1 offers higher potential for future gains (e.g., 29% reduction in global warming impacts), compared to VF2 (34% reduction potential). These findings underscore the relevance of broader changes in upstream production systems, technology maturity and site-specific conditions in shaping the sustainability of VFs, and emphasize the need for further research into context-dependent factors influencing their environmental performance.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 25, article id 100335
Keywords [en]
Circular economy, Life cycle assessment, Technological maturity, Urban agriculture, Vertical farms
National Category
Environmental Management Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-381089DOI: 10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100335ISI: 001748388200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105036153355OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-381089DiVA, id: diva2:2059400
Note
QC 20260512
2026-05-122026-05-122026-05-12Bibliographically approved