kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do female and male ergonomists rate female and male workers’ hand activity and force differently in identical regular industrial tasks?
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 87, Sweden; Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 87, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0882-818X
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 87, Sweden.
Section of Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 87, Sweden.
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, S-901 87, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, ISSN 0169-8141, E-ISSN 1872-8219, Vol. 114, article id 103963Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Women are more often affected by work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Accurate risk assessments are important, and there are indications that female workers are rated differently from their male counterparts.

Aim

To investigate whether female and male ergonomists rate hand activity and force differently in female and male workers.

Method

Ergonomists (n = 54) assessed videos of female and male workers performing identical hand-intensive tasks. Workers' and ergonomists' genders were compared.

Results

Female and male ergonomists did not differ significantly in how they rated workers' hand activity or force. However, force was consistently rated higher in female workers than in male workers (mean difference: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18–0.52, p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between ergonomist sex and worker sex.

Conclusion

Ergonomists' hand activity and force ratings showed no sex-related observer bias. However, ergonomists detected higher force levels in female workers, likely reflecting sex-related strength differences among workers rather than sex or gender differences among ergonomists. These findings support prioritizing risk assessment of female workers' hand force exposure in hand-intensive work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 114, article id 103963
Keywords [en]
Ergonomist, Gender, Observer, Risk assessment, Sex
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-382808DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2026.103963ISI: 001770122200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105038687620OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-382808DiVA, id: diva2:2064987
Note

QC 20260602

Available from: 2026-06-02 Created: 2026-06-02 Last updated: 2026-06-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Forsman, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahlgren, GunillaForsman, Mikael
By organisation
Ergonomics
In the same journal
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Occupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf