kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explainable machine learning-enhanced aerodynamic characteristic analysis of bluff bodies under interference effects
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5806-8460
AIWE Lab, School of Intelligent Civil and Ocean Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics. (FLOW)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2228-1179
AIWE Lab, School of Intelligent Civil and Ocean Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2999-1878
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Physics of fluids, ISSN 1070-6631, E-ISSN 1089-7666, Vol. 38, no 7, article id 075133Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aerodynamic interference has a critical impact on wind-resistant design. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based explainable machine learning framework to predict and interpret the aerodynamic characteristics of bluff bodies under interference effects. A large-scale two-dimensional CFD dataset comprising 3360 three-bluff-body interference case configurations was established, covering 140 layouts and 24 wind angles. Detailed aerodynamic analysis shows that the observed behavior does not arise from a single interference mechanism like shielding effects, channeling effects, or wake interference, but rather from their coupled action. Their interactions reshape pressure distributions and global aerodynamic forces across different interference layouts. Based on this dataset, eight machine learning (ML) models were benchmarked for predicting aerodynamic force coefficients, among which the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest accuracy, yielding an R2 of 0.962. To enhance interpretability, global, conditional, and local SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses were conducted to quantify the contributions of wind angle of attack and interference location features to the aerodynamic loads, thereby linking dominant features to the underlying flow mechanisms. In addition, the RF model was further applied to predict surface pressure distributions with an R 2 of up to 0.974, and SHAP analysis was performed to quantify the influence of interference location parameters on representative pressure points. Furthermore, uncertainty quantification was conducted to evaluate prediction reliability, providing confidence estimates alongside aerodynamic predictions for individual interference configurations. The proposed framework enables rapid and interpretable assessment for large numbers of interference scenarios, facilitating aerodynamic evaluation during early-stage design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AIP Publishing , 2026. Vol. 38, no 7, article id 075133
National Category
Energy Engineering Vehicle and Aerospace Engineering Fluid Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-386093DOI: 10.1063/5.0334205ISI: 001816262400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105044598692OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-386093DiVA, id: diva2:2088136
Note

QC 20260724

Available from: 2026-07-24 Created: 2026-07-24 Last updated: 2026-07-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Liu, Junle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ke, YanyuLiu, JunleChen, WenliangHu, GangTse, K. T.
By organisation
Fluid Mechanics
In the same journal
Physics of fluids
Energy EngineeringVehicle and Aerospace EngineeringFluid Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf