kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of different post surface treatments on the surface characteristics, corrosion resistance and metal migration from L-PBF additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
Swerim AB, Department of Materials and Process Development, Kista, Sweden.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Chemistry, Surface and Corrosion Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2123-2201
Swerim AB, Department of Materials and Process Development, Kista, Sweden.
Alfa Laval Technologies AB, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Results in Materials, E-ISSN 2590-048X, Vol. 27, article id 100748Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Additive manufacturing (AM) using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) enables the fabrication of complex metal components with high precision. However, the as-printed surfaces often exhibit high roughness, residual stresses, and partially fused particles, which can negatively impact the mechanical performance, corrosion resistance, and fatigue life. Surface treatments are therefore required to improve surface integrity, reduce defects, and enhance functional properties such as corrosion resistance. This study explores the impact of chemical and mechanical post-processing methods including pickling, clean hot isostatic pressure (HIP), Hirtization, shot peening (SP), and isotropic super finishing (C.A.S.E.) on the microstructure, surface composition and topography of L-PBF printed HIP treated 316L stainless steel surfaces in relation to their corrosion resistance and extent of metal dissolution in artificial tap water with and without chlorides (1 and 3 wt% Cl). Corrosion studies were also performed in NaCl (2.1 wt% Cl) based on the ASTM G61 standard. The utilization of a combination of electrochemical, chemical, microscopic, and spectroscopic techniques discerned notable differences for the differently surface treated AM 316L in terms of microstructure, surface topography, surface roughness, surface oxide composition and barrier properties, metal dissolution, corrosion resistance as well as pitting corrosion resistance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2025. Vol. 27, article id 100748
Keywords [en]
316L, Electrochemical performance, L-PBF, Metal dissolution, Microstructure, Post processing, Surface composition
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology Materials Chemistry Metallurgy and Metallic Materials Surface- and Corrosion Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-369189DOI: 10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100748Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105013100511OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-369189DiVA, id: diva2:1993111
Note

QC 20250829

Available from: 2025-08-29 Created: 2025-08-29 Last updated: 2025-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Herting, GunillaOdnevall, Inger

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herting, GunillaOdnevall, Inger
By organisation
Surface and Corrosion Science
In the same journal
Results in Materials
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining TechnologyMaterials ChemistryMetallurgy and Metallic MaterialsSurface- and Corrosion Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf