Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Arctic games: An analytical framework for identifying options for sustainable natural resource governance
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Hållbar utveckling, miljövetenskap och teknik, Miljöstrategisk analys (fms).ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9330-4868
Vise andre og tillknytning
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: The Polar Journal, ISSN 2154-896X, E-ISSN 2154-8978, Vol. 6, nr 1Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Changes in the Arctic are fuelled by a variety of drivers, including global warming, economic growth, improved access to natural resources, technological advances and globalisation processes. Further, the region is characterised by a diverse set of international agreements, national legislations and common pool resources. This presents challenges for actors to suggest, evaluate and agree on sustainable development alternatives. We propose an analytical framework to better understand (1) the types of trade-offs associated with Arctic futures and (2) actors’ incentives for strategic behaviour. In the framework, game theory illuminates incentives and strategies among actors, cost-benefit analysis and economic valuation of ecosystem services help identify socially desirable outcomes and institutional analysis provides insight on how governance structures can support or interfere with policy intervention. We apply the proposed framework by analysing possible oil development futures for Lofoten in Northern Norway. For example, institutional analysis and estimates of costs and benefits of reducing oil spill risk and their distribution among actors are used for discussing incentive structures, including the use of side payments as a mechanism to mitigate conflicting interests. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor and Francis Ltd. , 2016. Vol. 6, nr 1
Emneord [en]
Cost-benefit analysis, Environmental governance, Game theory, Institutional analysis, Oil extraction, Valuation of ecosystem services
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-207523DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2016.1171001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85015383047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-207523DiVA, id: diva2:1103931
Merknad

Export Date: 22 May 2017; Article; Correspondence Address: Söderqvist, T.; Enveco Environmental Economics ConsultancySweden; email: tore@enveco.se. QC 20170531

Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-05-31 Laget: 2017-05-31 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Håkansson, Cecilia

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Håkansson, CeciliaNoring, M.
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
The Polar Journal

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 203 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf