Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk and gender: Daredevils and eco-angels
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och historia, Filosofi.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-4671-758X
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, Springer Nature , 2012, s. 1029-1048Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Through history and in most cultures differences between men and women have been observed and expressed in various ways. Also in our society differences between men and women are evident and this becomes particularly clear in the context of risk perception. This chapter will present three models that are found in the research literature that aim at explaining these differences. The first model focuses on differences due to knowledge and familiarity with science, including trust. This model however, fails to take into consideration the distinction between estimated knowledge and factual knowledge, making it difficult to understand exactly what role knowledge plays in risk perception. Second, differences between men and women have also been explained by biological mechanisms or social roles. Here it is believed that women are more nurturing by nature and men are more driven toward growth and expansion. It is argued that it is of limited importance whether these differences are biological or social, as it will have little bearing on the management of risk. The third explanation focuses on cultural differences and uses examples from disaster management. Here it is concluded that women are by social processes most often excluded from the areas where risks are created and managed, and suffer the consequences from this lack of influence in disasters. The chapter concludes with three suggestions for future research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer Nature , 2012. s. 1029-1048
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-309706DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_41Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84952781023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-309706DiVA, id: diva2:1644996
Merknad

Available in ISBN 9789400714335, 9789400714328.

QC 20220315

Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-03-15 Laget: 2022-03-15 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-20bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Wester, Misse

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Wester, Misse
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 211 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf