Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Estimation of the probable maximum size of inclusions using statistics of extreme values and particle size distribution methods
KTH, Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM), Materialvetenskap, Processer. Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Refractories & Met, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China..ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7585-4674
Northeastern Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Key Lab Anisotropy & Texture Mat, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China..
Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Refractories & Met, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China..
Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Refractories & Met, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China..
Vise andre og tillknytning
2022 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Materials Research and Technology, ISSN 2238-7854, E-ISSN 2214-0697, Vol. 20, s. 2454-2465Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Prediction of the maximum size of inclusion in a large weight of steel using data from a small volume steel sample is an important topic for steelmakers. Therefore, the probable maximum sizes (PMS) of inclusions in three steel grades were evaluated by the statistics of extreme values (SEV) and the particle size distributions (PSD) methods based on three-dimensional (3D) investigations of inclusions using the electrolytic extraction (EE) method. The effect of number of measurements and size of unit area on the PMS of in-clusions were investigated. The results showed that at least 80 measurements of NMIs should be done in the SEV method, while in the PSD method the number of measurements has little influence when the number of inclusions in the observed areas was large enough. The effect of unit area size on the PMS of inclusions in the SEV method can be ignored for small-sized inclusions (less than 10 mm). The PMS of inclusions determined from the SEV method agreed with that from the PSD method by considering the 95% confidence interval. The SEV method was preferred when predicting the PMS of inclusions because of its simplicity by reducing the cost and labour involved compared to the PSD method.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 20, s. 2454-2465
Emneord [en]
Electrolytic extraction, Statistics of extreme values, Particle size distribution, Maximum size
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-320670DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.177ISI: 000863126400009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85145557678OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-320670DiVA, id: diva2:1707648
Merknad

QC 20221101

Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-11-01 Laget: 2022-11-01 Sist oppdatert: 2024-09-02bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Wang, YongJönsson, Pär

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Wang, YongJönsson, Pär
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 167 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf