All long-term hydropower planning problems require a forecast of the inflow during the planning period. However, it is challenging to accurately forecast inflows for a year or more. Therefore, it is common to use stochastic models considering the uncertainties of the inflow. This paper compares deterministic and stochastic models in a weekly rolling horizon framework considering inflow uncertainty. The stochastic model is tested in both a risk-neutral and a risk-averse version. The rolling horizon framework helps make periodic decisions and update the information in each rolling week, which minimizes the errors in prolonged forecasts. The models aim to utilize the water stored in the rainy season throughout the year with minimum load shedding while storing as much water as possible at the end of the planning horizon. The Conditional Value at Risk ((Formula presented.)) risk measure is used to develop the risk-averse stochastic model. Three different risk measures are investigated to choose the risk measure that yields the best outcome in the risk-averse problem, and the two best measures are compared to a deterministic and risk-neutral model in a weekly rolling horizon framework. The results show that the risk-neutral and best risk-averse models perform almost equally and are better than the deterministic model. Hence, using a stochastic model would be an improvement to the actual planning performed in the Ethiopian and other African countries’ power systems.