kth.sePublikationer KTH
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Panel or check? Assessing the benefits of integrating households in energy poverty into energy communities
INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n 46022 València, Spain, Camino de Vera, s/n.
Institute for Energy Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n 46022 Valencia, Spain, Camino de Vera, s/n.
Institute for Energy Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n 46022 Valencia, Spain, Camino de Vera, s/n; Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft, 2600 GA, The Netherlands, GA.
KTH, Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM), Energiteknik, Tillämpad termodynamik och kylteknik.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-2603-7595
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2024 (Engelska)Ingår i: Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, ISSN 2213-1388, E-ISSN 2213-1396, Vol. 71, artikel-id 103970Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This research raises the possibility for households in energy poverty to participate in shared photovoltaic systems in renewable energy communities (REC) to reduce their energy costs, with investment costs covered by public institutions. It begins by evaluating the current solution for vulnerable households, which relies on public subsidies to lower energy costs without addressing root causes or improving environmental impacts. The study compares traditional subsidies with REC participation for vulnerable households. By simulating a REC composed of such households, the results indicate that REC participation is more cost-effective for public institutions than energy subsidies. At the economically optimal size of 31 kWp, the cost of subsidies decreases by 58,000 €, a 50% reduction, with household savings increasing by 6%. At 58 kWp, the need for additional support checks is eliminated, increasing household savings by 65% but with a lower NPV of 22,500 €. The largest viable system, 75 kWp, increases average household savings by 82%. This approach also leads to a net reduction in GHG emissions, engaging previously excluded households in the energy transition.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 71, artikel-id 103970
Nyckelord [en]
Energy checks, Energy poverty, Just energy transition, Renewable energy communities, Self-consumption
Nationell ämneskategori
Energisystem
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-353909DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2024.103970ISI: 001321503700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204046320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-353909DiVA, id: diva2:1900984
Anmärkning

QC 20241014

Tillgänglig från: 2024-09-25 Skapad: 2024-09-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-10-14Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Sommerfeldt, Nelson

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sommerfeldt, Nelson
Av organisationen
Tillämpad termodynamik och kylteknik
I samma tidskrift
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Energisystem

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 104 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf