kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment tensions: How climate mitigation futures are marginalized in long-term transport planning
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies. VTI Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6846-2381
2020 (English)In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, ISSN 1361-9209, E-ISSN 1879-2340, Vol. 87, article id 102503Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Deep uncertainties in planning and policy-making related to climate mitigation pathways actualises the need for transport planning practices that embrace exploration and assessments of alternative future development directions. While conventional, forecast-based assessment practices are acknowledged to be of limited relevance in assessing potential trend-breaking developments, those practices have become strongly institutionalised and proven difficult to challenge. Applying a discourse perspective, this paper contributes with a practice-oriented analysis of how knowledge perspectives and established assessment practices influenced the consideration of alternative development directions and policy measures in the Swedish 12-year National Investment Plan for road and rail infrastructure 2018–2029. More specifically, the analysis regards how alternative futures and measures aimed at supporting a more ’transport efficient society’ were addressed and assessed. The analysis illuminates a strong influence of established practices over the definition of what is considered relevant knowledge, in constructing an understanding of transport infrastructure investments as insignificant to climate mitigation, and in legitimizing the marginalization of alternative development directions. In effect, the study shows how established practices may result in significant democratic consequences, when public and political discussion over transport futures and climate mitigation pathways is constrained by a narrow span of possible futures presented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2020. Vol. 87, article id 102503
Keywords [en]
Transport planning, Climate mitigation, Discursive practice, Foresight, Forecasting, Scenarios
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Transport Science; Planning and Decision Analysis; Planning and Decision Analysis, Strategies for sustainable development
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-279106DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102503ISI: 000581017900022Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089349861OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-279106DiVA, id: diva2:1458211
Projects
Mistra Sustainable Accessibility and Mobility Services (SAMS)
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research, SAMS
Note

QC 20201113

Available from: 2020-08-14 Created: 2020-08-14 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Approaching transformative futures: Discourse and practice in Swedish national transport policy and planning
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Approaching transformative futures: Discourse and practice in Swedish national transport policy and planning
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis concerns the need to transform the transport system to meet climate mitigation objectives. It provides insights into how specific approaches and practices in transport policy and planning affect prospects for transformation. It focuses on specific practices and knowledge perspectives in policy and planning, exploration of future uncertainty, and the scope and agency attributed to planning for influencing the future development of the transport system. The empirical interest is directed towards contemporary Swedish national transport policy and planning, analyzed in four articles: organization and procurement of physical planning of road and rail investments (Article 1), an emerging discursive framing of digitalized, 'smart' accessibility (Article 2), the approach to future uncertainty in the national investment plan for transport infrastructure 2018-2029 (Article 3), and an inter-agency collaboration on a plan for a fossil-free transformation of the transport system (Article 4).

The thesis follows a qualitative research approach based on a social constructivist and poststructuralist understanding of knowledge as socially constructed and sustained. To highlight the influence of practice and knowledge perspectives on understandings of the future development of the transport system and conditions for transformation, a Foucauldian discursive approach is applied. This approach emphasizes reciprocal dependency between discourse and practice.

Results make evident that Swedish national transport planning and policy is largely characterized by a ‘conventional’ approach with dominant quantitative practices and knowledge perspectives, through which the future is mainly portrayed as a continuation of the historical development. The studies show that this approach strongly influence how the transport system and prospects for transformation are understood and described. The thesis illustrates tendencies to avoid issues of future uncertainty, and how this is taken as an argument for not exploring alternative development directions. Consequently, opportunities to influence future development are portrayed as limited. This has a restrictive effect on the conditions for transformation. However, the thesis also shows contexts where future uncertainty is considered as a basic planning condition, which justifies exploration of opportunities for transformation by broader practices and knowledge perspectives.

Overall, the thesis makes visible ways in which specific practices and knowledge perspectives exert significant influence over which choices regarding future pathways that are presented to the public and decision makers. A central conclusion regards a need for a more politically oriented discussion on what knowledge and practices in transport policy and practice that are relevant and fit for purpose in the light of the climate mitigation challenge as well as other societal objectives.

Abstract [sv]

Denna avhandling tar sin utgångspunkt i behovet av omställning av transportsystemet för att möta politiskt uppställda klimatmål. Den bidrar med insikter om hur specifika förhållningssätt och praktiker i policy och planering inom transportområdet påverkar förutsättningar för omställning. Fokus riktas mot specifika praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv, hur aspekter av framtida osäkerhet i utvecklingen hanteras, och vilken roll som planering antas kunna spela i den framtida utvecklingen av transportsystemet. Avhandlingens empiriska intresse riktas mot samtida svensk nationell transportpolicy och -planering, som analyseras genom fyra delstudier: organisering och upphandling av fysisk planering av väg och järnväg (artikel 1), en framväxande diskursiv förståelse av digitaliserad, ’smart’ tillgänglighet (artikel 2), förhållningssätt till framtida osäkerhet i Nationell plan för transportsystemet 2018-2029 (artikel 3), samt ett myndighetsgemensamt utarbetande av en plan för omställning av transportsystemet till fossilfrihet, populärt benämnt SOFT (artikel 4).

Avhandlingen följer en kvalitativ forskningsansats grundad i en socialkonstruktivistisk och poststrukturalistisk syn på kunskap som socialt konstruerad och upprätthållen. För att belysa praktikers och kunskapsperspektivs inflytande över förståelser av transportsystemets framtida utveckling och förutsättningar för omställning tillämpas en Foucauldiansk diskursiv ansats. Denna ansats betonar ett ömsesidigt beroende mellan diskurs och praktik.

Resultaten visar att svensk nationell transportplanering och policy i hög grad präglas av ett så kallat ’konventionellt’ förhållningssätt till transportsystemet, med dominerande kvantitativa praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv genom vilka framtiden i huvudsak framställs som en fortsättning på den historiska utvecklingen. Studierna i avhandlingen visar att detta förhållningssätt får stort inflytande över hur transportsystemet och förutsättningar för omställning förstås och beskrivs. Avhandlingen visar på tendenser att undvika osäkerhet om framtiden, och hur detta tas som argument för att inte utforska alternativa utvecklingsriktningar och anspråk på framtiden. En konsekvens är att möjligheter att påverka utvecklingen framställs som begränsade. Avhandlingen visar dock också på sammanhang där framtida osäkerhet beaktas som en grundläggande planeringsförutsättning, vilket motiverar utforskande av möjligheter till omställning utifrån bredare praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv.

Sammantaget synliggör avhandlingen att specifika praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv har betydande inflytande över vilka vägval kring transportsystemets framtid som presenteras för allmänheten och beslutsfattare. En slutsats är att detta inflytande, i kombination med de kontrasterande praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv som präglar olika planeringssammanhang, motiverar en tydligare politiskt orienterad diskussion om vilken kunskap som är relevant i ljuset av uppställda samhällsmål, och vad som utgör relevant praktik i relation till det.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2021. p. 72
Series
TRITA-ABE-DLT ; 2048
Keywords
transport planning, transport infrastructure, climate mitigation, transformation, planning practice, uncertainty, assessment
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Planning and Decision Analysis, Urban and Regional Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-288092 (URN)978-91-7873-754-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-01-29, För videolänk registrera er hos / For videolink register at https://kth-se.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_eghJol1zToaRI-2HiP4d7w, Du som saknar dator/datorvana kan kontakta kis@kth.se / Use the e-mail address if you need technical assistance,, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20210107

Available from: 2021-01-07 Created: 2020-12-22 Last updated: 2025-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Witzell, Jacob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Witzell, Jacob
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
In the same journal
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 525 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf