kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Chemical mass shifts of cluster ions and adduct ions in quadrupolar ion traps revisited and extended
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Chemistry, Organic chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3091-3882
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Chemistry, Applied Physical Chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3444-9987
2023 (English)In: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, ISSN 0951-4198, E-ISSN 1097-0231, Vol. 37, no 3, article id e9436Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

RationaleChemical mass shifts in quadrupolar ion traps have been studied previously but only for a limited number of analytes and mass ranges. Here, mass shifts of cluster ions, commonly used as calibrants, and other analytes are qualitatively evaluated on the Bruker amaZon spherical ion trap (QIT) and the Finnigan LXQ linear ion trap (LIT). To extend the mass range from previous experiments m/z up to 4000 are investigated. MethodsChemical mass shifts of CsI, Y(HCOO)(3), and NaCF3COO cluster ions, CF3COO-, Na+, and Cs+ adduct ions, protonated commercial calibration solutions and peptides, and deprotonated peptides were investigated on the Bruker amaZon speed QIT and some of these were also investigated on the Finnigan LXQ LIT. ResultsOn both instruments, peak distortions and mass shifts toward lower m/z became apparent as m/z approached 1000. To some extent, the issues were more severe at slower scans. Peak distortions included loss of resolution, tailing, or fronting and were different between the amaZon QIT and the LXQ LIT. The noncluster and nonadduct ions analyzed showed no obvious mass shifts or peak distortions under the same analysis conditions. ConclusionsAs expected, the ion traps investigated here showed mass shift and peak distortion issues, and such issues persisted at m/z up to 4000 on both instruments. Peak distortions were different between the amaZon QIT and the LXQ LIT, and were not always visible despite mass shifts. Both mass shifts and peak distortions make cluster ions and some adduct ions unsuitable for ion trap calibration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2023. Vol. 37, no 3, article id e9436
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-322849DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9436ISI: 000897104500001PubMedID: 36410697Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85145955722OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-322849DiVA, id: diva2:1724741
Note

QC 20230109

Available from: 2023-01-09 Created: 2023-01-09 Last updated: 2023-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Romson, JoakimEmmer, Åsa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Romson, JoakimEmmer, Åsa
By organisation
Organic chemistryApplied Physical Chemistry
In the same journal
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 253 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf