kth.sePublications KTH
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A critical review of the life cycle climate impact in seaweed value chains to support carbon accounting and blue carbon financing
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7840-9189
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0354-7189
2022 (English)In: CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, ISSN 2666-7894, Vol. 6, article id 100093Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Seaweed is often touted as a blue economy resource with climate benefits. Several calls are made to scale the industry up and to use blue carbon financing to create additional incentives for the sector to expand. But how much of a climate crisis panacea is seaweed, and under which conditions can climate benefits be realized? The article reviews the literature on climate impacts from seaweed value chains and proposes a cradle-to-grave structure for carbon accounting in seaweed value chains. While the literature points towards several ways in which climate benefits can be generated, the evidence base for net negative emissions across the value chain is not robust enough to suggest seaweed value chains, by default, are a climate solution. Instead, climate effects depend on the specific production setup, product choice and the fate of the product on the market. Climate benefits can only be claimed by tracking blue carbon flows across whole life cycles and over time. Knowledge gaps relate to effects at sea, the role of temporarily locking carbon into products and the effects of introducing this resource to the market. Blue carbon financing should be directed only to setups proven to lead to additional and permanent carbon storage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 6, article id 100093
Keywords [en]
Blue carbon, Seaweed, Aquaculture, Climate benefits, Carbon accounting
National Category
Climate Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-323576DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100093ISI: 000906612100012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85138499406OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-323576DiVA, id: diva2:1735322
Note

QC 20230208

Available from: 2023-02-08 Created: 2023-02-08 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hasselström, LinusThomas, Jean-Baptiste

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hasselström, LinusThomas, Jean-Baptiste
By organisation
Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering
Climate Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf