Speech synthesis evaluation methods have lagged behind the development of TTS systems, with single sentence read-speech MOS naturalness evaluation on crowdsourcing platforms being the industry standard. For TTS to successfully be applied insocial contexts, evaluation methods need to be socially embedded in the situation where they will be deployed. Due to the time and cost constraints of conducting an in-person interaction evaluation for TTS, we examine the effect of introducing situational context and preceding sentence context to participants in a subjective listening experiment. We conduct a suitability evaluation for a robot game guide that explains game rules to participants using two synthesized spontaneous voices: an instruction-specific and a general spontaneous voice. Results indicate that the inclusion of context influences user ratings, highlighting the need for context-aware evaluations. However, the type of context did not significantly affect the results.