kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review
Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Dalmine, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7671-6927
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production engineering, Industrial Production Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0723-1712
Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Dalmine, Italy.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5222-970X
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Computer applications in engineering education, ISSN 1061-3773, E-ISSN 1099-0542, Vol. 32, no 3, article id e22712Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Blended Learning (BL) is defined as a combination of face-to-face and digital activities that, in recent years, has been adopted more and more frequently by Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). In the engineering field, the adoption of BL allows creating challenging situations for students with industry-like problems to foster the acquisition of advanced problem-solving skills. Thus, it can be used to enhance traditional learning by enriching it with new aspects, allowing to update the Intended Learning Outcomes traditionally defined by teachers. Although prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) teachers had the time to prepare and programme the transition to BL, during the pandemic they had to abruptly move to the full digital delivery of the content, requiring technological and organizational adaptation, as well as change in the content teaching and assessment methods. Through a systematic literature review, this paper aims to understand how BL has been implemented in the engineering field by HEIs, discussing if and how the learning expectations of teachers (evaluated through Bloom's Taxonomy) change when using different mixes of face-to-face and digital activities and when the target audience changes. More specifically, the investigation addresses how content and learning expectations are split and set in face-to-face and digital settings. Additionally, the interest is towards understanding how COVID-19 impacted the adoption of BL, not only during the pandemic but also after.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2024. Vol. 32, no 3, article id e22712
Keywords [en]
blended learning, Bloom's taxonomy, constructive alignment, COVID-19, Engineering
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-366937DOI: 10.1002/cae.22712ISI: 001137235300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85181454868OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-366937DiVA, id: diva2:1983560
Note

QC 20250711

Available from: 2025-07-11 Created: 2025-07-11 Last updated: 2025-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Maffei, AntonioEnoksson, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sala, RobertoMaffei, AntonioEnoksson, FredrikLjubić, Sandi
By organisation
Industrial Production SystemsProduction engineering
In the same journal
Computer applications in engineering education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf