kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Political Ghosts in the Swedish Welfare Machine: De-Politicisation, Neoliberal Technocracy and Quasi-Markets in Swedish University Property Management
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Management & Technology. Energy Systems Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University, Linköping Sweden; Institute for Global Sustainability Boston University, Boston MA USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8508-4212
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Management & Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7129-5040
Political Science Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University, Linköping Sweden.
Social Policy School of Social and Political Science University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh UK.
2026 (English)In: Social Policy and Society, ISSN 1474-7464, E-ISSN 1475-3073Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This article examines how the discursive logic of quasi-markets in Swedish university real-estate management enables depoliticisation while consolidating state control. Sweden is a distinctive case where universities are public agencies, yet most campus property is owned by Akademiska Hus AB, a profit-seeking corporation wholly owned by the state. Using interpretive policy and frame analysis of legislation, government decisions, and public debate, we trace how market rents were introduced and justified. We show that depoliticising narratives portraying academics as fiscally unaccountable and university space as wasteful legitimise New Public Management reforms. Extending the 'ghost in the machine' metaphor, we demonstrate how political logics permeate welfare governance but are rendered less visible. The quasi-market sustains centralised control and fuels distrust between universities and government, risking a cycle of expanding quasi-market instruments and reduced institutional autonomy. Diminished autonomy may in turn have implications for academic freedom.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press (CUP) , 2026.
Keywords [en]
framing, metaphors, narrative analysis, quasi-markets, Swedish higher education
National Category
Public Administration Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-376417DOI: 10.1017/S1474746425101279ISI: 001661902500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105028013931OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-376417DiVA, id: diva2:2036228
Note

QC 20260206

Available from: 2026-02-06 Created: 2026-02-06 Last updated: 2026-02-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nordensvärd, JohanKaulio, Matti A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordensvärd, JohanKaulio, Matti A.
By organisation
Management & Technology
In the same journal
Social Policy and Society
Public Administration StudiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf