kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing Solar Structure Detection Methods in SDO/AIA Observations and the Application to Raw Uncalibrated Data
Centre for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics (CmPA), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5797-0794
Centre for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics (CmPA), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Centre for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics (CmPA), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea, South Korea; Centre for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics (CmPA), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4616-947X
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation:, E-ISSN 2993-5210, Vol. 3, no 3, article id e2025JH001023Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent advances in solar physics increasingly rely on automated identification of coronal structures using machine learning. Yet most studies emphasize scientific performance without evaluating feasibility for onboard deployment to prioritize downlink observations. This work investigates the automated identification of active regions and coronal holes by applying segmentation and detection techniques to Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) data. We compare three approaches: SCSS-Net, a deep learning model for semantic segmentation; YOLOv8n, a lightweight object detector; and a traditional pipeline based on basic computer vision operations (BCVO). Each method is assessed for its scientific accuracy and its suitability for deployment in future resource-limited missions. While no direct hardware benchmarking is performed in this study, we assess the feasibility of onboard implementation based on the associated number of trainable parameters, architecture and hardware requirements. Training and evaluation are first conducted on well-calibrated SDO images. We then extend the evaluation to raw and uncalibrated SDO images affected by instrumental artifacts. Performance is measured using the Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice score. Results show that while SCSS-Net achieves the highest segmentation quality, YOLOv8n offers a strong balance between accuracy and efficiency. The BCVO pipeline remains viable under strict hardware limitations. Interestingly, our models retain compatibility on Level-0 observations. This is the first study comparing these widely used methods from the perspective of onboard deployment. Our findings provide a foundation for designing frameworks tailored to onboard hardware configurations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Geophysical Union (AGU) , 2026. Vol. 3, no 3, article id e2025JH001023
Keywords [en]
Level-0 SDO, SDO, active regions, coronal holes, machine learning, solar coronal structure detection
National Category
Computer graphics and computer vision Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-383049DOI: 10.1029/2025JH001023Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105039875481OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-383049DiVA, id: diva2:2066809
Note

QC 20260605

Available from: 2026-06-05 Created: 2026-06-05 Last updated: 2026-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Antunes, PedroPodobas, Artur

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gonidakis, P.Jeong, H. J.Antunes, PedroPodobas, ArturRaptis, S.Toy-Edens, V.Jin, M.Poedts, S.Magdalenic, J.Miloshevich, G.
By organisation
Computing and Learning Systems
Computer graphics and computer visionAstronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf