kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Including maintenance in life cycle assessment of road and rail infrastructure—a literature review
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Sustainability Assessment and Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0231-7111
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Sustainability Assessment and Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5535-6368
Trafikverket.
2022 (English)In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, ISSN 0948-3349, E-ISSN 1614-7502, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 316-341Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

LCA is increasingly used in infrastructure policy and planning. This study maps approaches used in comparativeLCA of road and rail infrastructure to (1) determine the length of the analysis period, (2) estimate the maintenance frequency,and (3) include the efects of climate change on infrastructure performance. A LCA may need to fulfl diferent requirementsin diferent decision-contexts. The relevance of the approaches for decision-making in policy and procurement is thereforediscussed.

Methods

Ninety-two comparative LCAs of road and rail infrastructure published in peer-reviewed journals January 2016–July 2020 were reviewed. Papers were found through a systematic process of searching electronic databases, applying inclusion criteria, and conducting backward and forward snowballing.

Results and discussion

The analysis period was commonly determined based on infrastructure service life. The maintenancefrequency was estimated based on current practice, laboratory tests, modelling, or scenarios. The efects of climate changewere considered in two papers by comparing results in a control case and in a changed climate. In policy and procurement,current practice approaches are not adapted to innovative solutions or to climate change. Modelling and laboratory tests couldimprove calculations of the maintenance phase but might have some limitations related to innovative solutions. Scenarioscould be readily applied in a policy context; however, in procurement, consistent and generic scenarios should be used.

Conclusions

Results suggest what approaches could be used to account for maintenance in infrastructure LCA dependingon the decision-context. The LCA community is suggested to research other approaches than current practice to account forlong analysis periods, climate change, and innovative solutions. Additionally, literature not covered here could be reviewedfor additional approaches and perspectives. Examples include stand-alone LCAs, method development papers, papers onthe individual approaches and decision-contexts, certifcation systems, standards, and guidelines.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2022. Vol. 27, no 2, p. 316-341
Keywords [en]
Life cycle assessment; Infrastructure; Road; Rail; Maintenance; Review; Procurement; Policy
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Planning and Decision Analysis, Environmental Strategic Analysis
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-312502DOI: 10.1007/s11367-021-02012-xISI: 000746459900003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123575071OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-312502DiVA, id: diva2:1659193
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

QC 20221012

Available from: 2022-05-19 Created: 2022-05-19 Last updated: 2022-10-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1117 kB)552 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1117 kBChecksum SHA-512
53496bbdd6b1065ff35223f4cb24b93d7d0ddc72a784473c2c9d0bb36cb67f00c9ea1f3abe8db753e7f2724f5956bc6509aa2486c5d29ff75e1552d26c0e5311
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Liljenström, CarolinaBjörklund, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liljenström, CarolinaBjörklund, Anna
By organisation
Sustainability Assessment and Management
In the same journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 555 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 401 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf