kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the Inability of the Moving Interface Model to Predict Isothermal Solidification Time During Transient Liquid Phase (TLP) Bonding of Ni-Based Superalloys
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, 11365-9466, Iran.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L7, ON, Canada.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Materials Science and Engineering, Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5891-0638
2022 (English)In: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, ISSN 1073-5623, E-ISSN 1543-1940, Vol. 53, no 1, p. 126-135Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Understanding diffusion-induced isothermal solidification time during transient liquid phase bonding is vital in producing intermetallic-free robust joints. The isothermal solidification completion time is overestimated by the existing analytical models, even by the closest one to the real bonding conditions, known as the moving interface model. It was found that the boride formation in the diffusion affected zone of Ni-based superalloy upon using B-containing filler metals is one of the reasons behind the inability of the moving interface model to predict the isothermal solidification completion time accurately, which has received scant attention in the literature. Moreover, simplified assumptions in deriving the moving interface model such as constant interfacial solute concentration, which is only valid for binary systems, along with the independency of diffusion coefficient to concentration introduce errors when estimating the isothermal solidification time using the moving interface model. The significant discrepancy between the predicted and experimentally obtained isothermal solidification times reinforces the idea that the existing moving interface analytical model needs to be modified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2022. Vol. 53, no 1, p. 126-135
Keywords [en]
Analytical models, Isotherms, Nickel alloys, Solidification, Superalloys, Bonding conditions, Completion time, Diffusion-affected zone, Interface modeling, Isothermal solidification, Moving interface, Ni-based superalloys, Solidification time, Solute concentrations, Transient liquid-phase bondings, Diffusion
National Category
Metallurgy and Metallic Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-313129DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06497-xISI: 000715173200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85118542893OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-313129DiVA, id: diva2:1670149
Note

QC 20220615

Available from: 2022-06-15 Created: 2022-06-15 Last updated: 2022-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Salmasi, Armin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Salmasi, Armin
By organisation
Structures
In the same journal
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A
Metallurgy and Metallic Materials

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf