kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comprehensive analysis of the optical and thermal performance of solar absorber coatings under concentrated flux conditions
Ctr Invest Opt, AC Unidad Aguascalientes, Prol Constituc 607,Fracc Reserva Loma Bonita, Aguascalientes 20200, Mexico..
Ctr Invest Opt, AC Unidad Aguascalientes, Prol Constituc 607,Fracc Reserva Loma Bonita, Aguascalientes 20200, Mexico..
Univ Intercultural Indigena Michoacan, Posgrad Ingn Sostenibil Energet, Carretera Patzcuaro Huecorio Km 3, Patzcuaro 61614, Michoacan, Mexico..
Ctr Invest Cient Yucatan, Unidad Mat, Calle 43 130, Merida 97205, Yucatan, Mexico..
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Solar Energy, ISSN 0038-092X, E-ISSN 1471-1257, Vol. 239, p. 319-336Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Solar Absorber Coatings (SACs) are widely used materials for improving thermal efficiencies of solar receivers. Traditionally, these SACs are investigated using heat treatments to test their optical-thermal properties; however, tests under concentrated flux conditions are still required. In this work, the thermal efficiency of different SACs is experimentally evaluated and compared. The analyzed SACs are: (1) Pyromark®2500, (2) Solkote®, (3) Thurmalox®250, (4) Comex® and (5) a new Soot from Forest Biomass (SFB) based coating. To assess the SACs performance, a High Flux Solar Simulator along with a calorimetric test bench are implemented under a well-controlled indoor environment applying two levels of concentrated irradiance of 100 ± 3 kW/m2 and 415 ± 12 kW/m2 named low and high flux level, respectively. Results show that, for a low flux level, the analyzed coatings present thermal efficiencies in a range from 91.74% to 83.24%, exhibiting a slightly close performance in most of the cases. Correspondingly, for a high flux level, the efficiencies range from 88.69% to 72.69%, with Pyromark®2500 being the most efficient in both cases. In addition, variations in the optical properties are reported for the experimental campaign with the high flux level, observing slight changes in the spectral absorptance and emittance. From these results, Pyromark presents the highest drop in solar absorptance of 1.22%, which is attributed to microcracks observed through the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Thus, the presented approach can provide valuable information about the effects that concentrated flux levels can have in the optical-thermal performance of the analyzed samples.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2022. Vol. 239, p. 319-336
Keywords [en]
Solar absorber coating, Calorimeter, High flux solar simulator, Soot of forest biomass, Concentrating solar power
National Category
Energy Systems Condensed Matter Physics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-315342DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.05.015ISI: 000809826200005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85131129688OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-315342DiVA, id: diva2:1680532
Funder
StandUp
Note

QC 20220704

Available from: 2022-07-04 Created: 2022-07-04 Last updated: 2026-04-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wang, Wujun

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wang, Wujun
By organisation
Heat and Power Technology
In the same journal
Solar Energy
Energy SystemsCondensed Matter Physics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 202 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf