kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Nanodiamond and Diamond Film Production
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Sustainability Assessment and Management. KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, KTH Climate Action Centre, CAC. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Centres, Digital futures. Norwegian Inst Sustainabil Res NORSUS, N-1671 Krakeroy, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9873-0949
Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Environm Syst Anal, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9258-0641
2024 (English)In: ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, E-ISSN 2168-0485, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 365-374Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Diamond possesses extraordinary properties, including extreme hardness, thermal conductivity, and mechanical strength. Global industrial diamond production is dominated by synthetic diamond, with important commercial applications in hard coatings and semiconductors. However, the life cycle impacts of synthetic diamond materials are largely unknown. The main aim of this study is to conduct the first detailed life cycle assessments of the typical production routes for nanodiamond and diamond film, which are detonation synthesis and microwave chemical vapor deposition, respectively. The functional units were set to 1 g nanodiamond and 1 cm2 diamond film. A limited number of inputs dominate the assessed impacts: explosives and cooling water for nanodiamond production, and electricity and substrate for diamond film production. Diamond film manufacturers can reduce their global warming, freshwater eutrophication, and terrestrial acidification impacts by 62-71% by sourcing wind or solar instead of global average electricity. However, this comes at the expense of increased mineral resource scarcity impacts at 57-73%. A comparison between nanodiamond and synthetic diamond grit shows that the grit's global warming impact is about 5 times higher, suggesting that nanodiamond is environmentally preferable. The ready-to-use unit-process data from this study can be applied in future studies of products containing these materials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Chemical Society (ACS) , 2024. Vol. 12, no 1, p. 365-374
Keywords [en]
detonation nanodiamond, diamond film, detonationsynthesis, microwavechemical vapor deposition, life cycle assessment, life cycle inventory
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-342861DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c05854ISI: 001138372300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85181084678OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-342861DiVA, id: diva2:1833572
Note

QC 20240201

Available from: 2024-02-01 Created: 2024-02-01 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Furberg, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Furberg, AnnaArvidsson, Rickard
By organisation
Sustainability Assessment and ManagementKTH Climate Action Centre, CACDigital futures
In the same journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
Other Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf