kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Large‐scale marine protected areas and imaginaries of progress in ocean governance
Centre for the Public Awareness of Science Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia;School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3405-2549
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4997-4215
2024 (English)In: Geo: Geography and Environment, E-ISSN 2054-4049, Vol. 11, no 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Large-scale marine protected areas (LSMPAs) are an increasingly important feature of global conservation as countries strive to meet international commitments to protect 30% of all land and sea areas by 2030. In this paper, we contribute to current interest in the imaginaries that underpin environmental governance. Drawing together work on spatial and sociotechnical imaginaries, we examine how ocean imaginaries get bound up with the rise of large, protected areas in the ocean. We develop a typology of three ocean imaginaries associated with LSMPAs, which is elaborated through an empirical analysis of the political discourse that surrounded the designation of 17 LSMPAs since 2010. We examine extracts of government statements, speeches and press releases predominantly in news article sources and government websites to consider how these ocean imaginaries are institutionally stabilised and aligned with advances in science and technology. Our analysis reinforces an understanding that the kinds of spatial imaginaries that are created for environmental governance shape and are shaped by policy and management strategies. We also find that both visions of ocean spaces and the social worlds that perceive them can be multiple. We contend that research and policy need to recognise LSMPAs and other area-based conservation measures as more-than-technical pursuits, and harness geographic scholarship to consider and enable a multiplicity of imaginaries in exploring options for environmental governance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2024. Vol. 11, no 2
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-357948DOI: 10.1002/geo2.155ISI: 001368771100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85208643897OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-357948DiVA, id: diva2:1922819
Projects
Anthropocene History
Note

QC 20241230

Available from: 2024-12-19 Created: 2024-12-19 Last updated: 2024-12-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hartman Davies, Oscar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Montana, JasperHartman Davies, Oscar
In the same journal
Geo: Geography and Environment
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf