kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘Void’ land and nuclear colonialisms: Storied landscapes of the Bishnoi as untended spaces in India’s nuclear imaginaries
Friedrich-Alexander University, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4044-7344
2024 (English)In: Changing Climates: Environmental Histories of Extractivism and Speculation, 2024Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

For the Bishnoi, among the earliest eco-conservationists in the Indian subcontinent, encounters with the atom have been encounters of colossal ruptures. Their histories, geographies, ecological intimacies, and nonhuman worlds have collided with India’s nuclear trajectories at two sites – in the arid deserts of Pokhran where India conducted atomic tests in 1974 and 1998, thus forcing the Bishnoi into the ranks of the Global Hibakusha, and in Gorakhpur, where India is setting up a 2800Mwe nuclear power plant. In both instances, the storied landscapes of the Bishnoi – assemblages of humans, heritages, and revered nonhuman animals, trees, plant species, and water bodies – have been irradiated (Pokhran) and appropriated (Gorakhpur) by India’s nuclear establishment through narrativizing these lands as ‘barren’, ‘unpeopled’, and ‘infertile’. As Karen Barad notes, the narrativization of landscapes as 'untended' and 'empty' has been a well-worn tool in the service of nationalism, scienticism, colonial appropriation, and the erasures of indigenous presence. The landscapes of the Bishnoi, embodying palimpsestic layers of local histories, community traditions and post-colonial land-holding practices in India on the one hand, and the human, nonhuman bodies and materialities that have populated these lands on the other, have shaped Bishnoi claims on and belongingness to these lands. By contrast, the nuclear establishment’s forcible appropriation of Bishnoi lands for the nuclear plant may be seen as claims on place that imagine futures by the Indian state through unimagining the presence of Bishnoi lifeworlds. Bishnoi resistance against the Gorakhpur nuclear project thus, can be understood as a means to assert that their lives and landscapes, and intimacies with their nonhuman worlds are both visible and grievable. Unraveling multiple layers of this fascinating episode from India’s recent nuclear historiography, this paper will seek to think about/with land as Bishnoi heritage, and a resource in India’s (colonial) nuclear enterprise. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024.
Keywords [en]
land, extractivism, Bishnoi, nuclear, India
National Category
Technology and Environmental History
Research subject
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-364840OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-364840DiVA, id: diva2:1970477
Conference
2024 ASEH Annual Conference, The Westin Denver Downtown, Denver, Colorado, April 3-7, 2024
Note

QC 20250617

Available from: 2025-06-16 Created: 2025-06-16 Last updated: 2025-08-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Conference website

Authority records

Huria, Sonali

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Huria, Sonali
Technology and Environmental History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf