kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International regimes and bodily infractions: The case of nuclear liability, the women of Bhopal and the Indian aberration
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History, History of Science, Technology and Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4044-7344
2023 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In its current avatar, with the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) at its fulcrum, the global architecture on nuclear liability under the aegis of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has decisively normalized the indemnification of international nuclear suppliers.

However, India remains an aberration to this de jure universalization ofthe CSC-based regime. The domestic nuclear liability law that India enacted in 2010 allows for liability to be channeled to nuclear suppliers, both domestic and international private entities. This anomaly is owed in large part to grassroots voices, particularly the women of Bhopal in central India. The decades-long struggles for justice and accountability of these women, survivors of the world’s worst chemical industrial disaster in 1984 in Bhopal, shaped India’s domestic liability debate in significant ways. Both, their active protests against the liability law, as well as expressions of solidarity with anti-nuclear grassroots mobilizations in India at the time, led to this important aberration.

This paper will seek to engage with the various conceptualizations surrounding gender, technology, progress, risk, justice, and ethics implicated in these fascinating developments. When contrasted with organizational discourses on nuclear liability led by the IAEA, the abstractions and the “tendency to forget the vulnerability of flesh” (Mensch 2009, 5) in thinking of ‘liability’ primarily in terms of financial risk and potential losses to nuclear corporations, become glaringly evident. This paper will explore the challenges thrown up to such disembodied notions of what it means to be entangled with harm in the nuclear age through the discursive intrusions of the women of Bhopal. In so doing, they bring our attention to the asymmetrical ways in which risk, dispossession, harm, and exposure are distributed (and compensated), and thus, compel us to re-examine how international legal, political, and technical regimes respond to the challenges of living with toxic legacies in the Global South.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023.
National Category
Humanities and the Arts Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-364842OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-364842DiVA, id: diva2:1970492
Conference
Webinar "'Bodies Out of Line' in the Contemporary Global South" organised by the Research Network "History of Body Politics in the Global South", September 19, 2023
Note

QC 20260227

Available from: 2025-06-16 Created: 2025-06-16 Last updated: 2026-02-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Research Network: History of Body Politics in the Global South

Authority records

Huria, Sonali

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Huria, Sonali
By organisation
History of Science, Technology and Environment
Humanities and the ArtsSocial Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf