kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uncertainty and Triple Access Planning in European Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: a long way to go yet?
Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2692-1484
Centre for Transport and Society, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7551-9198
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4360-1207
Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6118-1330
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Transportation planning and technology (Print), ISSN 0308-1060, E-ISSN 1029-0354, Vol. 48, no 6, p. 1330-1352Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Triple Access Planning (TAP) is the idea that accessibility can be delivered through physical mobility, digital connectivity, and spatial proximity. There is great uncertainty as to how far one of these three elements will substitute for or complement the others in delivering the accessibility we need in future. Sustainable Urban Mobility (SUM) Planning is touted as a relatively new paradigm in local transport planning oriented to the achievement of a wide range of societal objectives. The paper presents a review of how well SUM Plans from eight European countries, and national guidelines from four currently account for TAP and uncertainty in their approach. Our findings suggest that while the concept of physical proximity is well-understood, other aspects of the TAP and uncertainty approach are not. Digital connectivity is largely ignored. The planning future is treated as largely certain, with no consideration of disruptive factors that might alter this future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2025. Vol. 48, no 6, p. 1330-1352
Keywords [en]
decarbonisation, digital accessibility, mobility planning, SUMP, transport planning
National Category
Human Geography Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-367381DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2024.2311804ISI: 001162339500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185671711OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-367381DiVA, id: diva2:1984688
Note

QC 20260129

Available from: 2025-07-17 Created: 2025-07-17 Last updated: 2026-01-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Svensson, TonyWitzell, Jacob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rye, TomLyons, GlennSvensson, TonyLenferink, SanderMladenovič, LukaPiras, FrancescoWitzell, Jacob
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
In the same journal
Transportation planning and technology (Print)
Human GeographyTransport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf