kth.sePublications KTH
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life
School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden; Faculty of Health Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies. School of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4360-1207
Department of Design, Production and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Health Expectations, ISSN 1369-6513, E-ISSN 1369-7625, Vol. 28, no 4, article id e70339Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.

Objective: This qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.

Methods: Through a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi‐structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke ( n  = 3), significant others ( n  = 3), healthcare professionals ( n  = 4), care managers ( n  = 3) and architects ( n  = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.

Findings: Sixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30–74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age‐friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non‐discrimination: shared decision‐making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient‐centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.

Conclusion: This study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home‐based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long‐term conditions.

Patient or Public Contribution: This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project ‘(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B‐SURE)’, which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B‐SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2025. Vol. 28, no 4, article id e70339
Keywords [en]
built environment, home rehabilitation, life after stroke, person-centred, qualitative method, rehabilitation process, stroke recovery
National Category
Occupational Therapy Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Neurology Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-368944DOI: 10.1111/hex.70339ISI: 001520960400001PubMedID: 40600503Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009707362OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-368944DiVA, id: diva2:1991340
Note

QC 20250822

Available from: 2025-08-22 Created: 2025-08-22 Last updated: 2025-09-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Svensson, Tony

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensson, Tony
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
In the same journal
Health Expectations
Occupational TherapyPublic Health, Global Health and Social MedicineNeurologyNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf