kth.sePublications KTH
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Water and Environmental Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6682-9239
Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Tradgardsgatan 18, SE-753 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: Project Leadership and Society, E-ISSN 2666-7215, Vol. 6, article id 100194Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The pressing need for sustainability transitions requires not only new project outcomes, but also new ways of leading and organizing projects. The study aims to examine how circularity, understood as the reuse and recycling of materials, challenges the conventional project life cycle by changing processes, roles, and governance. A case of a nature-based park constructed with circular materials was conducted using interviews, observations, and site visits. The results show that circularity reshapes project leadership in three key ways. First, circular material sourcing requires an iterative and adaptive project process, which extends the front-end and overlaps with delivery. This disrupts linear, stage-gated models and introduces ongoing decision-making and flexible planning throughout the lifecycle. Second, the changing process reconfigures project roles: project managers take on expanded and evolving leadership, including facilitating collaboration, managing uncertainty, and communicating sustainability values across phases. Third, the findings underscore the need for adaptive governance, including engaged clients and flexible contracting, to support circular practices. These insights extend existing research on sustainability in and by projects by showing how circularity is not merely a design principle but an organizing logic that restructures internal processes, leadership roles, and governance arrangements. The study advances theory on how circularity functions not only as a sustainability goal but also as a transformative force in project organizing and leadership.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2025. Vol. 6, article id 100194
Keywords [en]
Circularity, Construction, Governance, Project life cycle, Project organizing, Sustainable project leadership
National Category
Business Administration Public Administration Studies Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-372039DOI: 10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194ISI: 001586828500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105017930547OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-372039DiVA, id: diva2:2011614
Note

QC 20251105

Available from: 2025-11-05 Created: 2025-11-05 Last updated: 2025-11-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lingegård, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lingegård, Sofia
By organisation
Water and Environmental Engineering
Business AdministrationPublic Administration StudiesConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf