kth.sePublications KTH
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Urban-rural integration in China: The role of the rural homestead transfer in different rural areas
China land Problem Research Center & and College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, 210095, PR China.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2080-6859
2026 (English)In: Habitat International, ISSN 0197-3975, E-ISSN 1873-5428, Vol. 167, article id 103613Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Land system reform is a central component of the structural-economic transformation of rural China. The activation of rural land factors is consistent with urban and rural integration, which requires a balance between factors of land, labor and capital. We develop a theoretical framework of urban-rural factors that incorporates three components: land, labor and capital and estimate the effects of rural homestead transfer (RHT) by comparing three cases of different practices at different rural homestead transfer cases. In the first case, results suggest that rural labor can only choose emigration due to non-existing local industries. In the second case, the off-site replacement was successful with the optimal allocation and reorganization of land and industries. Nevertheless, the improvement of household living standard and comprehensive rural revitalization was insufficient. In the third case, the reform has achieved local industrialization and urbanization at “low level”. The land factor and the labor force were well integrated, resulting in return migration and livelihood diversification forms. the activation of land factors, return migrations of the rural labor and industrialization are critical factors for rural economic development. The promotion of coordinated development of these factors can positively affect household living standards and rural revitalization. This highlights the importance of place-oriented development strategies for comprehensive rural revitalization through the reform process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 167, article id 103613
Keywords [en]
Industry, Land development rights, Livelihood, Rural homestead transfer, Rural vitalization, Urban-rural integration
National Category
Economics Human Geography Economic History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-372887DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103613ISI: 001603887000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105020597573OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-372887DiVA, id: diva2:2013850
Note

QC 20251114

Available from: 2025-11-14 Created: 2025-11-14 Last updated: 2025-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Westlund, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westlund, Hans
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
In the same journal
Habitat International
EconomicsHuman GeographyEconomic History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf