kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Policies and Modeling of Energy Systems for Reaching European Bioenergy Targets
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Mälardalen University (MDH), Västerås, Sweden.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Handbook of Clean Energy Systems, Wiley , 2015, p. 1-17Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

To mitigate carbon dioxide emissions, the European Union (EU) and many countries around the world have set into action different policy tools such as a carbon tax or feed-in tariffs. Most instruments have, directly or indirectly, an impact on the use of biomass for energy purposes. The principal policy tools relevant to bioenergy production and applied in the EU are described in this article and their observed impact on bioenergy production levels is assessed. In addition, a model application on the policy tools is presented to assess future impact of policies on production of energy carriers from lignocellulosic biomass at the EU level and at the international level. This model application is based on the optimization model BEWHERE, which determines the optimal location and technology of a set a bioenergy conversion plants, minimizing the cost of the supply chain. Sweden, Austria, and Finland are the three countries that are highlighted in the EU. An international perspective is also included by presenting a Brazilian case study. From the modeling results, it can be derived that integrated biofuel production would be the most competitive way for biofuel production and that a carbon tax and the emission trading scheme are the most cost-efficient solutions to decrease emissions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2015. p. 1-17
Keywords [en]
BEWHERE, bioenergy plants, Brazil, energy policy, EU, lignocellulosic feedstock, optimal localization, second-generation biofuel, sugarcane residuals
National Category
Energy Engineering Energy Systems Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-378584DOI: 10.1002/9781118991978.hces102Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105031688285OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-378584DiVA, id: diva2:2048251
Note

Part of ISBN 9781118388587, 9781118991978

QC 20260324

Available from: 2026-03-24 Created: 2026-03-24 Last updated: 2026-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Khatiwada, Dilip

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khatiwada, Dilip
By organisation
Energy and Climate Studies, ECS
Energy EngineeringEnergy SystemsOther Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf