kth.sePublications KTH
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing Peripheral Focus in Myopes and Non-myopes: Introducing "Depth-of-refraction"
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Applied Physics, Bio-Opto-Nano Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8837-3837
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Applied Physics, Bio-Opto-Nano Physics.
Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Östersund, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Solna, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Ophthalmic & physiological optics, ISSN 0275-5408, E-ISSN 1475-1313, Vol. 46, no 1, p. 60-72Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Peripheral image quality is of high relevance to myopia research, yet peripheral refraction is difficult to define due to aberrations affecting the depth-of-focus. This study investigated the peripheral image quality (±25° horizontal field) using three different image quality metrics, with added sphero-cylindrical wavefronts to find the best correction.

Methods: Nineteen adults (9 myopes, 10 emmetropes) and 33 children (5 myopes, 28 non-myopes) were measured using a dual-angle wavefront aberrometer as part of the Stockholm Myopia Study. The optical image quality was calculated from the wavefronts, for 10,000 different sphero-cylindrical corrections around the 2nd-order Zernike refraction, to find the best correction as well as the range of corrections with similar image quality (“depth-of-refraction”).

Results: Overall, the peripheral best focus was not distinct, with a large depth-of-refraction. Emmetropes/non-myopes had larger peripheral depth-of-refraction than myopes (mean values of 2.69 and 1.74 D, respectively (Strehl ratio metric)). For some subjects, this span of corrections was of a multifocal character. The prevalence of multifocality depended on the image quality metric but was generally more common in emmetropes/non-myopes than in myopes.

Conclusions: The peripheral visual field does not always have a clear best focus and can show multifocal properties in some individuals, with different corrections yielding similar image quality. As emmetropes/non-myopes had more multifocality and larger depth-of-refraction than myopes, this indicates that inherent peripheral optical properties can play a role in myopia development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2026. Vol. 46, no 1, p. 60-72
Keywords [en]
Depth-of-focus, Emmetropia, Multifocality, Myopia, Peripheral image quality, Objective refraction
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-383168DOI: 10.1007/s44402-026-00023-5ISI: 001746761700004PubMedID: 41790181Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105033490376OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-383168DiVA, id: diva2:2067771
Note

QC 20260608

Available from: 2026-06-08 Created: 2026-06-08 Last updated: 2026-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Börjeson, CharlieVedhakrishnan, ShrilekhaUnsbo, PeterLundström, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börjeson, CharlieVedhakrishnan, ShrilekhaUnsbo, PeterLundström, Linda
By organisation
Bio-Opto-Nano Physics
In the same journal
Ophthalmic & physiological optics
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf